A recent survey conducted by the Australian Financial Review has revealed strong support among readers for state governments in Australia to compel local councils to address housing density and increase housing supply. The survey gathered responses from 552 individuals, with 56 percent backing the initiative as the Minns Labor government in New South Wales (NSW) evaluates significant development projects.
Respondents highlighted Sydney’s status as one of the least dense major cities globally, with one participant stating, “Sydney is among the least dense major cities in the world. This needs to change.” The sentiment reflects a growing consensus that urban density must be addressed, particularly as the region grapples with housing shortages.
Despite the overwhelming support for increased urban density, some readers expressed concerns regarding the potential disregard for local residents’ opinions. One respondent noted, “I feel the views of pre-existing residents are being unduly discounted and attacked. Residents do have a right to try to maintain the character of their area.” This sentiment illustrates the delicate balance that state governments must navigate between expanding housing and respecting community character.
In a separate but related issue, the survey also revealed insights into perceptions of the opposition Coalition’s climate policies. Only 23 percent of respondents indicated they would be more likely to support the Liberal and National parties if they abandoned their commitment to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Nearly half of those surveyed stated that a shift away from net zero would make them less inclined to vote for the Coalition in future elections.
One reader emphasized the importance of climate commitments, stating, “I will not vote for any individual or party that is not taking climate change and net zero seriously.” Another indicated that they would consider financially supporting the Labor Party if the Coalition abandoned its net zero target, saying, “If the Coalition decides to drop its commitment to net zero by 2050, I will actively support the Labor Party with donations for the first time in my life.”
The survey’s findings come against the backdrop of internal tensions within the Coalition regarding climate policy. Andrew Hastie, a Liberal MP and vocal opponent of net zero, recently suggested he might resign from the shadow cabinet if the party continues to endorse the 2050 target. Meanwhile, Jonathon Duniam, the opposition education spokesman, has echoed concerns shared by constituents.
One reader cautioned party leaders against alienating potential voters, stating, “Why alienate some swinging voters? If supporters of dropping net zero policy will vote for you anyway, then no gain in change unless you bring along swinging voters with this change.” This highlights the strategic considerations political parties must account for as they navigate complex voter sentiments.
Conversely, not all readers were in favor of Australia’s role in reducing global emissions. One respondent remarked, “Commitment to net zero by 2050 is worth less than the paper it is written on; none of the politicians who make the commitment will be around by then.” This skepticism underscores a broader debate about the practicality and accountability of long-term climate targets.
The survey also delved into public opinion on other pressing issues. More than 70 percent of readers expressed support for Sussan Ley, the Opposition Leader. In terms of childcare policies, 46 percent disagreed with the Albanese government’s proposal to implement a daily flat-fee system for universal childcare, while 41 percent supported the initiative. Among the polled individuals, nearly half were aged over 65, and 64 percent identified as male, indicating potential generational differences in perspectives.
Concerns were also raised regarding a proposed 5 percent cash flow tax on companies by the Productivity Commission, with 52 percent of respondents opposing the plan. Only 28 percent expressed support for the new tax.
Finally, the survey highlighted the growing presence of technology in daily life, with more than half of the participants reporting that they use artificial intelligence at least occasionally each week. 16 percent indicated they utilize AI up to five times a day, while 23 percent stated they rarely use the technology. Notably, 15 percent of respondents reported they have never interacted with artificial intelligence.
Overall, the survey results reflect a complex landscape of opinions on housing, climate policy, and technological adoption, underscoring the diverse perspectives of Australians as they engage with critical issues facing their communities.
