Chevron, the U.S. oil and gas supermajor, has signed an agreement in principle with Iraq’s Oil Ministry to develop the significant Nasiriyah oil field along with other oil-producing fields and exploration sites. This agreement marks a notable return for Chevron and other Western firms to Iraq, which had seen a significant exit of major players around seven years ago, most notably with ExxonMobil’s withdrawal from the Common Seawater Supply Project (CSSP).
The current influx of interest from top-tier companies follows a period of instability and corruption concerns that led to the earlier exodus. ExxonMobil is reportedly also in discussions with Iraqi authorities regarding new opportunities in the oil sector. Other U.S. firms have recently secured exploration and development agreements, contributing to a renewed Western interest in Iraq’s vast energy resources.
Factors Behind the Return
The reasons behind the renewed interest in Iraq are complex. While the country has always possessed considerable oil and gas potential, the return of these companies is largely attributed to new assurances from Iraqi authorities regarding operational transparency. Senior energy, legal, and security sources have indicated that the previous lack of transparency and high corruption risks were significant deterrents for firms like ExxonMobil.
According to the non-governmental organization Transparency International, Iraq ranked poorly on corruption and governance, with rampant issues including embezzlement and bribery. The organization described the environment as one that severely limited the government’s ability to manage corruption effectively. This context heavily influenced ExxonMobil’s decisions to withdraw from projects in Iraq, including the CSSP and West Qurna 1 oilfield.
New Framework for Engagement
Negotiations for future projects are expected to emphasize three key elements: cohesion, security, and streamlining. Cohesion involves ensuring that infrastructure related to energy projects is completed efficiently. Security pertains not only to the protection of personnel but also to maintaining robust business and legal practices. Streamlining refers to the necessity for agreements to remain intact despite potential shifts in the Iraqi government.
Chevron’s previous experiences in Iraq, particularly its dealings with the Iraqi National Oil Company (INOC) in 2021, have heightened the need for caution. Historical negotiations for the Nasiriyah project date back to 1975, with various attempts to develop the field stymied by geopolitical tensions and corruption. Previous bids for the project, including a significant push in 2014 for the Nasiriyah Integrated Project, were halted due to concerns over legal and financial transparency.
The renewed agreement with Iraq’s Oil Ministry is seen as a potential turning point. The government has adapted its contractual frameworks, offering more favorable terms that include revenue sharing once production begins. Although the tax rate remains set at 35% on profits, the alterations are viewed as more attractive to international investors.
As Chevron moves forward with this agreement, it will likely implement rigorous oversight and compliance measures. U.S. legal and accounting firms will play a critical role in ensuring that all agreements are thoroughly vetted, and security arrangements are anticipated to be monitored closely.
The landscape of Iraq’s oil sector is shifting, and Chevron’s return could signal a new chapter in the country’s efforts to tap into its immense energy potential. The coming months will reveal whether these new arrangements can foster a more stable and transparent business environment that encourages long-term investment from Western energy firms.
