During his address at the United Nations on September 23, 2023, Donald Trump delivered a controversial speech that lasted nearly an hour, significantly exceeding the 15-minute time limit set for speakers. The gathering marked the 80th anniversary of the UN, and Trump’s remarks drew a mix of applause and criticism from the international community. As he approached the podium, the assembled dignitaries offered him 13 seconds of applause, which extended to 20 seconds at the conclusion of his address.
Trump’s speech traversed various topics, ranging from the perceived failures of past US administrations to criticisms of UN migration policies and climate change initiatives. He warned the global leaders present that “your countries are going to hell,” reflecting a stark view of international affairs. Throughout his remarks, Trump praised his administration’s achievements, claiming credit for making the United States the “hottest country anywhere in the world” and for halting what he termed a “colossal invasion” of migrants at the southern border.
Critique of the United Nations
Trump openly criticized the UN, asserting that it has not met its potential in conflict resolution. “The UN is such tremendous potential,” he stated, emphasizing that the organization fails to follow up on its commitments. He suggested that the UN’s approach often results in “empty words” that do not lead to meaningful solutions in global conflicts. Instead, he extended an invitation for bilateral cooperation, stating that the United States seeks to lead nations willing to partner in creating a safer world.
This address comes at a time when the UN is grappling with significant budgetary issues, with approximately US$2.4 billion in unpaid dues from member states against a total budget of US$3.5 billion for 2025. Notably, the United States owes around US$1.5 billion of this total. The Trump administration has proposed a budget that excludes funding for UN peacekeeping operations, despite the US’s obligation to contribute significantly to these initiatives.
Stance on Global Conflicts and Migration
Trump addressed the ongoing conflict in Gaza, advocating for a cessation of hostilities and emphasizing the need for peace negotiations. He also criticized Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, but his commentary on these matters leaned more towards individual states rather than the UN’s role in facilitating multilateral solutions.
His remarks on migration were particularly incendiary, claiming that “your countries are being ruined” and accusing the UN of fostering an “assault on western countries and their borders.” Trump alleged that the UN provides financial assistance to migrants traveling to the United States and argued that its role should be to prevent invasions rather than enable them. This rhetoric, especially regarding European countries, could resonate with nationalist sentiments and amplify anti-migrant attitudes globally.
Additionally, Trump’s remarks on climate change were pointed. He dismissed climate science, describing it as “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world.” While he did not directly accuse the UN of failing in this regard, he directed criticism towards China for its wind turbine production, suggesting that the country exploits environmental initiatives without genuine commitment.
Trump’s address may not have completely alienated proponents of international cooperation, as he did not formally withdraw the US from any UN programs. Nevertheless, his comments indicated a clear preference for bilateral relationships over multilateral engagement. His perspective on sovereignty, migration, and climate change could embolden other political leaders to adopt similar positions, potentially undermining global cooperation.
The implications of Trump’s stance are profound. His skepticism towards the UN and multilateralism may lead to a reevaluation of funding priorities among member states, further straining an organization already facing significant challenges. As the world grapples with pressing issues, the need for effective international collaboration remains critical, yet Trump’s address raises questions about the future of such efforts in a shifting geopolitical landscape.
