The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has announced its intention to appeal against a recent court decision that dismissed a terror charge against rapper O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara. This development comes after Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring ruled the decision to charge O hAnnaidh as “unlawful” during a hearing at Woolwich Crown Court on September 26, 2023. The CPS stated that the appeal is based on the belief that there is a crucial point of law that requires clarification.
During the hearing in question, the court found that prosecutors should have obtained permission from the UK Attorney General before charging the rapper. This permission was only sought shortly before informing O hAnnaidh on May 21 that he would face a terror charge. The CPS maintains that such authorization was only necessary prior to O hAnnaidh’s first court appearance, which occurred about a month after the initial notification.
In the aftermath of the case dismissal, O hAnnaidh expressed defiance, vowing that the rap trio would “not be silenced.” He emphasized that this legal battle transcends personal implications, stating, “This entire process was never about me… It was always about Gaza, about what happens if you dare to speak up.” He also criticized the government for using the term “terrorism” to undermine dissenting voices.
The appeal has been met with scrutiny, particularly from Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary. He has called for an urgent inquiry into the circumstances of the case, claiming that it raises “serious questions about the competence of all those involved.” In response, Attorney General Lord Hermer cautioned Jenrick against making public comments that could potentially prejudice future legal proceedings against O hAnnaidh.
Prosecutors allege that O hAnnaidh can be seen in a recording from a performance at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, where he purportedly displayed the flag of Hezbollah and made statements in support of both Hezbollah and Hamas. This allegation has raised significant public interest, with many viewing it as a test case for freedom of expression in the context of political dissent.
In a subsequent interview with Virgin Media News, O hAnnaidh addressed the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, with a dismissive remark: “Better luck next time,” asserting confidence that even if the case had proceeded to trial, the outcome would have been favorable for him.
As the legal proceedings continue, the implications of this case extend beyond O hAnnaidh, touching on broader issues of free speech and the handling of political expression in the UK. The CPS’s decision to appeal signals a commitment to clarifying the legal framework surrounding such charges, but it also raises questions about the balance between security and civil liberties in contemporary society.
