Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has announced a revision to proposed legislation aimed at banning face masks and coverings for protesters. This decision comes after criticism from police and community leaders regarding the effectiveness of such measures in maintaining public safety and social cohesion. The new regulations will allow police to request the removal of masks if they suspect a protester is about to commit a criminal offence, rather than enforcing a complete ban.
The legislation is set to be introduced to the state parliament this week, but it marks a significant scaling back from the initial promise made by Allan following the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne. Last year, on December 17, Allan vowed to implement stricter measures, including a blanket prohibition on face coverings during protests, in response to a series of anti-Semitic incidents in the city.
Police Response and Legislative Concerns
The Victoria Police Association has expressed dissatisfaction with the revised legislation. Association leader Wayne Gatt criticized the effectiveness of the proposal, stating that it would not lead to substantial changes in the way police handle protests. In a statement to AAP, Gatt remarked, “If it amounts to our members having to ask protesters nicely whether they have a lawful reason for wearing a face covering, it should be renamed ‘the pretty please’ bill.” He further highlighted the challenges officers would face in addressing large groups of masked individuals.
Despite the backlash, Allan emphasized the necessity for police to have clear powers to address violent and extremist behaviours at protests. “No one has the right to spread hate or act violently on our streets, particularly around protests,” she stated. The Premier noted that the adjustments to the proposed legislation were made to ensure it could be effectively enforced and withstand potential legal challenges.
Details of the New Regulations
Under the new rules, protesters who refuse to comply with police requests regarding face coverings may face fines exceeding $1,000. Furthermore, the legislation will prohibit the display of terrorist symbols or flags during protests and ban the use of attachment or locking devices that could jeopardize public safety. Violators of these provisions could face penalties, including up to one year in prison.
Opposition Leader Brad Battin was quick to criticize the revised plan, arguing that the diluted measures would not adequately address public safety concerns. He stated earlier on Tuesday that the changes “simply won’t cut the cake,” calling for more robust actions to tackle extremist activities during protests.
As the debate continues, the effectiveness of the revised legislation in enhancing public safety and addressing community concerns remains to be seen. The upcoming discussions in the state parliament will likely be pivotal in determining how these new rules will be implemented and enforced by Victoria Police.
