A recent discussion among automotive experts has spotlighted what they consider the most controversial vehicle designs available in Australia for 2026. While performance metrics can be quantified, the aesthetics of a vehicle remain firmly in the realm of personal opinion. This article highlights a selection of cars that have garnered critical remarks for their appearance, as assessed by the team at CarExpert.
Hyundai Ioniq 6: An Unpopular Design Choice
Among the vehicles under scrutiny, the Hyundai Ioniq 6 emerged as a leading contender for the title of “ugliest car on sale.” Despite improvements following a recent facelift, opinions remain divided. The mid-size electric sedan features a rear design that some liken to an unappealing Apple mouse. Critics have pointed out that the Ioniq 6’s looks are reminiscent of the unpopular AU Falcon from 1998, which saw a dramatic decline in sales after its initial release. The Ioniq 6 struggled in the market, being outsold by the BMW i4 by more than four to one in 2022, which is viewed as a more aesthetically pleasing alternative.
MG IM6: A Design Misfire
Another vehicle drawing ire is the MG IM6, an electric SUV that some experts believe is irredeemably unattractive. The design combines elements that seem borrowed from various sources, resulting in a confused appearance. Critics note features such as its tall, narrow body and overly large front overhang. Despite a recent facelift, the vehicle’s design has not improved significantly, leading to the consensus that it struggles to find a cohesive identity.
Cadillac Lyriq: A Divisive Statement
The Cadillac Lyriq has also sparked debate among automotive enthusiasts. While the front design has garnered some praise, the rear has been described as overly complicated and lacking in visual harmony. Critics argue that the distinctive style that Cadillac has historically maintained seems absent in this electric SUV, leaving it feeling disconnected from the brand’s legacy.
The BMW XM has similarly faced scrutiny, with some calling it an “abomination.” Observers have noted its oversized features and lack of elegance, which they believe detracts from BMW’s longstanding reputation for sophisticated design.
Mahindra XUV700 and Subaru Outback Wilderness: Aesthetic Challenges
Among the more surprising entries is the Mahindra XUV700. Critics highlight the vehicle’s awkward proportions, particularly noting that the wheels appear too small for its body. The overall design has been described as outdated, resembling styles from the mid-2000s.
In contrast, the Subaru Outback Wilderness represents a departure from traditional Subaru aesthetics. While the brand is not typically associated with conventional beauty, the latest model has been criticized for excessive plastic cladding and an aggressive design that some find overwhelming. The Outback Wilderness aims to project ruggedness, but many feel it lacks the subtlety of its predecessor.
As discussions about automobile aesthetics continue, the opinions shared by the CarExpert team reflect a broader conversation within the automotive community. The vehicles mentioned here may not perform poorly, but their designs have sparked significant debate, leaving many potential buyers to consider the balance between style and substance. Readers are encouraged to share their views on these designs, further enriching the conversation around automotive aesthetics.
