Venture Global has successfully defended itself in an arbitration case brought by Shell and other European energy companies, which accused it of violating long-term contracts in favor of more lucrative spot-market sales. The arbitration tribunal ruled that Venture Global did not breach its contractual obligations, a significant victory for the U.S.-based LNG export company.
In 2023, Shell, along with BP, Repsol, Edison, and Portugal’s Galp, claimed that Venture Global profited from selling liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargos intended for long-term contracts at higher prices on the spot market. They alleged that the U.S. firm exploited a loophole by delaying the official commissioning of its first LNG plant at Calcasieu Pass, Louisiana. Venture Global countered that it was not required to fulfill its long-term commitments until the plant was officially operational, which occurred earlier this year.
Venture Global’s new LNG facility produced its first LNG at the end of 2024, prior to the plant’s official commissioning. This development raised concerns among its long-term customers who accused the company of prioritizing immediate profits over contractual obligations.
In response to the tribunal’s decision, a spokesperson for Shell stated, “We are disappointed with the outcome but respect the Tribunal’s decision.” Shell had previously accused Venture Global of wrongfully earning substantial profits from the spot market.
Venture Global emphasized the importance of adhering to negotiated contracts, stating, “Our industry and the investors and lenders who underpin it rely on respect for both the sanctity of negotiated contracts and the experienced, objective regulatory and legal bodies that govern it.” These comments reflect the broader implications of the case for the energy sector.
The fallout from the arbitration has led to significant repercussions. TotalEnergies, another European supermajor, declared earlier this year that it would cease business dealings with Venture Global due to the controversy. Chief Executive Patrick Pouyanne expressed his concerns, stating, “I don’t want to deal with these guys, because of what they are doing. … I don’t want to be in the middle of a dispute with my friends, with Shell and BP.”
This arbitration case not only highlights the tensions within the LNG market but also underscores the complexities of contractual relationships among major energy players. As the market evolves, the emphasis on compliance with contractual obligations remains critical for maintaining trust among stakeholders.
