Details have emerged regarding former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews and his engagement with prominent Chinese business leaders, highlighting his efforts to enhance economic ties between Australia and China. Over the past year, Andrews has participated in a series of meetings aimed at promoting the interests of significant Chinese state-owned enterprises, notably in the energy sector.
Investment Focus and Strategic Engagement
Andrews has advocated for the advantages of one of China’s largest state-owned energy companies as it significantly increased its investment in the Australian electricity grid. His recent activities included multiple trips to China, with three trips occurring between March and October 2024, and another in July 2024, just two months before a high-profile military parade in Beijing.
During these business trips, Andrews has leveraged over $416,000 of taxpayer funds previously allocated for his six trips to China while he served as premier. His efforts have involved promoting various sectors, including solar energy, e-commerce through giants like Alibaba, medical technology, airlines, and liquor companies.
Notably, Andrews met with Lyu Zexiang, Chairman of China Energy Engineering International, last year, further solidifying his connections within the Chinese business landscape. These interactions have drawn attention, particularly following a recent photograph of Andrews posing alongside notable figures such as Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-un, and Vladimir Putin during a visit to Tiananmen Square.
Questions on Transparency and Compliance
The nature of Andrews’ business dealings raises concerns about transparency. The companies linked to him in Australia—Glencairn Street, Wedgetail Partners, and Forty Eight & Partners—lack public visibility, with no websites or contact information available. Furthermore, Andrews is not listed on the federal government’s foreign influence register, prompting questions about compliance with existing regulations.
In a parliamentary session, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements, stating, “Everyone should comply with the law, it is as simple as that.” This statement reflects the broader scrutiny of Andrews’ actions, especially considering he began meetings with Chinese companies before the 18-month restriction imposed by Victoria’s ministerial code of conduct.
While the code serves as a guideline rather than a binding law, it highlights the potential for former ministers to rapidly transition their political influence into private sector opportunities. As these developments unfold, the implications for Australian-China relations and the accountability of public officials remain significant points of discussion.
