Crafting a curriculum vitae (CV) involves crucial decisions, particularly regarding what to include and omit. A significant dilemma for job seekers is whether to disclose academic weaknesses, such as low grades. Research conducted by academics, including Tom Lane, offers insights into this issue, particularly for recent graduates entering the competitive job market. The findings suggest that complete honesty about academic performance may not be the best strategy.
In the UK, undergraduate degrees are classified into categories: first-class, upper second (2:1), lower second (2:2), and third. While higher classifications are generally seen as indicators of strong academic performance, lower classifications carry less weight. Graduates with a lower classification face a decision: disclose their degree classification or simply state they have a degree without revealing the specifics. Misrepresenting degree classifications is ill-advised, as employers typically request verification of academic credentials.
Traditional economic theories might suggest that being transparent about one’s qualifications is beneficial. However, the study indicates that applicants who omit their specific degree classifications do not necessarily face negative repercussions. In fact, the research shows that job seekers with a third-class degree were the least likely to receive responses from potential employers.
To understand how job seekers navigate this dilemma, the research team analyzed CVs submitted on the job platform Monster. They found that a significant number of candidates left their degree classification undisclosed, likely including many with at least a 2:2 classification.
To further investigate, the team conducted a large-scale experiment, sending out over 12,000 applications to real graduate job vacancies. The applications varied only in terms of degree classification disclosure, while other details remained constant. The success of these applications was measured by the rate of interview invitations or further communication.
As anticipated, candidates with a first-class degree enjoyed the highest success rates. Surprisingly, those who omitted their degree classification fared better than those disclosing 2:2 and 2:1 classifications. Conversely, applicants who openly reported a third-class degree received the least favorable responses. This outcome suggests that full disclosure regarding low grades can hinder a candidate’s chances of moving forward in the hiring process.
These findings challenge the conventional wisdom of economic theory, which posits that failing to disclose information may lead to negative assumptions. The research indicates that recruiters often do not have the time to scrutinize every detail of an application. With hundreds of CVs to review, they may focus on standout positives or negatives, and missing information might simply go unnoticed. While interviewers may ask about academic performance later in the hiring process, concealing weaker grades can allow candidates to secure interviews where they can demonstrate their skills and qualifications.
The implications of this research are significant for job seekers. Those with strong academic records should highlight their achievements prominently. Conversely, candidates with lower grades are not obligated to disclose these details. While omitting such information does not guarantee success, it may enhance the likelihood of securing interviews.
As the graduate job market continues to be highly competitive, the study suggests that lower academic performance does not have to define a candidate’s prospects. Strategic omissions in a CV can potentially level the playing field for those whose academic records do not fully reflect their capabilities.
In summary, recent graduates, particularly those with lower degree classifications, may find it beneficial to consider their self-presentation carefully. There is no need to panic; in fact, it may be wise to withhold certain details to improve their chances in the job market.
