The pressure of selective school coaching is raising concerns among educators and parents alike, as reports highlight the detrimental effects on children’s mental health and overall well-being. In a recent article, Augusta Monro from Dural expressed relief at opting out of the competitive selective school test coaching, advocating for a more balanced approach to education that prioritizes children’s happiness.
The Stress of Selective Schools
Many students are subjected to rigorous tutoring and exam preparation, leading to heightened stress and anxiety. Monro noted that children should be enjoying their formative years, engaging in activities such as sports, arts, and simply relaxing with friends. The emphasis on academic achievement often overshadows the importance of a well-rounded childhood.
Selective schools, designed to cater to high-achieving students, have unintended consequences for local educational institutions. They divert some of the top talents away from community schools, impacting the overall academic environment. As children transition to selective schools, they may also lose connections with their local communities and peer groups, which can hinder their social development.
David Grover from Chatswood echoed similar sentiments, questioning the long-term benefits of such a competitive educational framework. He pointed out that the pressure does not dissipate once a student gains admission to a selective school; it often intensifies, as ongoing assessments and comparisons can lead to increased stress and mental health challenges.
Questioning Coaching Effectiveness
Despite this growing awareness, the NSW Department of Education maintains that external coaching does not provide an advantage in the selective school admissions process. Yet, a past editorial from the Herald indicated that approximately 95 percent of students in selective schools have received paid coaching. This raises significant questions about the fairness and effectiveness of the current testing system.
The normalization of coaching has commercialized the pathway to selective schools, making it a necessity for many families. This trend highlights the need for a reevaluation of how students are assessed for selective admission. There may be more equitable methods to identify students who would thrive in a selective environment without the added pressures of extensive coaching.
As the discourse continues, it is essential to prioritize the mental health and social well-being of students. Janice Creenaune from Austinmer emphasized that academic results should not be the sole measure of success; fostering emotional resilience and social skills is equally important for a student’s future.
With the educational landscape evolving, parents and educators are urged to consider the implications of selective school coaching on children’s lives. A balanced approach that values both academic excellence and emotional well-being could lead to healthier outcomes for future generations.
