Basil Zempilas, the leader of the Western Australian Liberal Party, is under scrutiny regarding his stance on the party’s controversial policy that aims to restrict access to gender-affirming healthcare for young individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria. This policy prohibits the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender-affirming surgeries for minors. Zempilas’ recent responses indicate a lack of clear support for the party’s position.
During an inquiry about his views on the policy, Zempilas’ spokesperson stated, “The Liberal Party took a policy to ban the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormone treatments, and surgical intervention for children under the age of 16 for the purpose of gender transition to the last election. Policies for the 2029 election will be developed and announced in due course.” This statement did not clarify whether Zempilas intends to maintain the existing policy or consider changes.
The previous Liberal leader, Libby Mettam, who has now assumed the role of deputy leader and shadow health minister, has been vocal about her stance. Mettam has pushed for the Cook government to implement a ban on the current treatment approach in Western Australia, similar to measures taken by governments in Queensland and the Northern Territory. Her comments followed an interview with journalist Bernard Lane in The Australian, where she expressed concern over the current model of care for children experiencing gender identity issues.
Mettam’s position stems from findings in the UK’s Cass Review, which evaluated youth gender services. The report has sparked debate within Australia regarding the adequacy of existing healthcare practices for transgender youth. Mettam stated, “I am deeply concerned that the model of care supported by the WA Government for children and young people presenting with gender identity issues could lead to lifelong harms.” She criticized the current model for potentially fast-tracking medical interventions without sufficient psychotherapy support.
Zempilas’ leadership has so far contrasted with Mettam’s approach. Since becoming the party leader in March 2025, he has not directly addressed whether he supports the policy that limits treatment options for transgender youth. Previously, Mettam faced backlash for not engaging with the parents of transgender youth, which raised concerns about the party’s commitment to understanding the needs of the LGBTIQA+ community.
While Zempilas has experienced significant interactions with the public as the former Lord Mayor of Perth, his previous controversial remarks about transgender individuals have drawn criticism. He later apologized and took steps to educate himself on transgender issues, establishing an LGBTIQA+ advisory group during his time in local government. Despite this, he has not committed to meeting with parents of transgender youth or engaging in dialogue with organizations like Rainbow Futures, which represents LGBTIQA+ communities.
The Liberal Party’s reliance on the Cass Review has also raised questions. Critics have pointed out that new research from Australian and international experts warns against some of its findings. Inquiries regarding Zempilas’ plans to consider this newer evidence went unanswered.
The differences in opinion between Zempilas and Mettam are evident beyond healthcare, as seen in their contrasting views on recent surrogacy legislation. Mettam opposed changes to the laws related to surrogacy and assisted reproductive technology, while Zempilas supported the reform. This divergence highlights potential fractures within the party on issues pertinent to the LGBTIQA+ community.
As the debate over gender-affirming healthcare continues, the Western Australian Liberal Party faces increasing pressure to clarify its stance and engage with affected communities. The forthcoming policies for the 2029 election may shape the party’s future approach to these critical issues, but for now, the responses from its leadership remain ambiguous.
