The Federal Court of Australia has ruled that the Australian government does not hold a duty of care towards the Torres Strait Islands or their inhabitants in relation to climate change impacts. This decision comes despite the government acknowledging the “devastating impacts” climate change has had on the region.
In a case that has drawn significant attention, two Torres Strait Islander men, Uncles Paul Kabai and Pabai Pabai, brought forth a lawsuit against the federal government in 2021. They alleged a “breach of duty of care” due to the severe environmental degradation affecting their islands, specifically Saibai and Boigu, which are experiencing rising sea levels and other climate-related challenges.
Both elders expressed deep concerns about the future of their islands. Uncle Paul Kabai, representing Saibai Island, stated, “We won’t have our culture … if Sabai goes under water, we lose everything. Our culture, our identity, our livelihood. It will all be gone.” Similarly, Uncle Pabai Pabai spoke about the loss of identity, saying, “If Boigu was gone, or I had to leave it because it was under water, I will be nothing. I will have nothing … I will become nobody.”
Judicial Findings and Implications
In his ruling delivered on Tuesday, Justice Michael Andrew Wigney acknowledged the factual allegations presented by the applicants and accepted the scientific evidence highlighting the adverse effects of human-induced climate change on the Torres Strait Islands. He noted, “Severe erosion, the salination of wetlands and previously arable land, the degradation of fragile ecosystems … has become more frequent and more severe in recent times.” Justice Wigney also stressed the pressing risk that the applicants’ fears regarding climate change could materialize.
Despite his recognition of the challenges faced by the Torres Strait Islanders, Justice Wigney ruled in favor of the Commonwealth, concluding that it “did not, and does not owe Torres Strait Islanders the duty of care alleged by the applicants.” He emphasized that issues of this nature are to be resolved through political processes rather than judicial rulings.
In his closing remarks, Justice Wigney highlighted the limitations of the current legal framework in Australia, stating, “The reality is that the law in Australia, as it currently stands, provides no real or effective legal avenue through which individuals and communities … can claim damages or other relief.” He indicated that public advocacy and protest remain the primary means for those affected to seek change.
Government Response and Future Actions
In response to the ruling, Energy Minister Chris Bowen acknowledged that communities in the Torres Strait are already experiencing the effects of climate change. Bowen mentioned that the government is finalizing a plan aimed at helping all communities in Australia understand climate risks and build resilience against these challenges.
The case highlights significant concerns regarding the legal responsibilities of governments in the face of climate change. With the ruling now public, it raises questions about the future avenues available for Indigenous communities seeking to protect their homes and way of life from the ongoing impacts of climate change.
As the Torres Strait Islands continue to face environmental threats, the voices of Uncles Kabai and Pabai resonate strongly, emphasizing the urgent need for action and support for vulnerable communities affected by climate change. The ruling serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue about climate responsibility and the rights of Indigenous peoples in Australia.
