Increasingly, experts are urging a shift in how mental health patients are treated in care settings. A new study by Daniel Lawrence reveals that the use of restrictive practices, such as physical restraint and seclusion, can be harmful and may exacerbate patients’ conditions. With NHS England reporting that 6,600 patients faced physical restraint and 4,500 were placed in seclusion in 2021 and 2022, the findings suggest a critical need for reform in mental health services.
Restrictive practices are intended as a last resort for managing risks posed by patients, yet their prevalence has sparked concern among mental health advocates and policymakers. Studies indicate that these practices can lead to severe trauma, worsening mental health outcomes, and even fatalities. Despite ongoing calls for their reduction, progress in implementing alternatives has been notably slow.
For over five years, Lawrence has researched the use of restrictive practices in mental health environments, focusing on how compassion can reshape care. His latest findings emphasize the importance of fostering a compassionate atmosphere among staff, prioritizing patient dignity and well-being.
The Historical Context of Restrictive Practices
The use of restrictive measures in mental health care has a long and troubling history. In England, legislative actions allowing the detention of individuals based on mental health issues date back to at least the 14th century. Early practices included binding patients and using physical punishment to “restore sanity.” By the early 19th century, methods such as straitjackets and confinement in locked rooms were widely accepted in asylums.
By the 1830s, a shift began as some clinicians recognized the ethical dilemmas posed by these practices. The campaign to abolish them gained traction, culminating in the UN recognizing restrictive practices as a human rights violation. In 2008, the UN’s special rapporteur on torture highlighted that solitary confinement violates key articles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This position was reaffirmed in 2021, emphasizing the urgent need for reform in mental health care systems globally.
The Impact of Restrictive Practices
Research shows that restrictive practices not only harm patients but also contradict the very goals of mental health treatment. Many patients entering care have histories of trauma that leave them feeling powerless and distressed. The application of methods that reinforce these feelings can worsen the issues that mental health services strive to address.
In extreme cases, the use of restrictive practices has resulted in patient deaths. Lawrence’s research identifies several factors that contribute to the continued use of these methods, including the emotional strain experienced by staff in high-pressure environments. Mental health wards often present stressful conditions, where incidents of aggression are common, leading staff to feel anxious and hyper-vigilant. This emotional turmoil can hinder their ability to respond to patients with the compassion necessary for effective care.
Research indicates that emotions such as fear and anger can lead to an increased likelihood of employing restrictive measures. This creates a cycle that perpetuates the use of harmful practices, rather than fostering a therapeutic environment.
The study suggests that employing compassionate care can transform these dynamics. Acknowledging the emotional challenges faced by staff and equipping them with better emotional management strategies can reduce reliance on restrictive practices. Lawrence introduces the concept of compassion-focused support groups tailored for staff in forensic mental health wards. These groups aim to cultivate a more empathetic and patient-centered approach to care.
By fostering an environment where staff feel secure and supported, the need for restrictive practices as a means of managing their own feelings of threat may be diminished. Early results from this intervention show promise, indicating a potential reduction in the use of restrictive practices under conditions of compassionate care.
Lawrence’s study is groundbreaking in its exploration of how emotional management among staff influences care decisions. It underscores the need for further research to continue the momentum toward reforming entrenched practices in mental health settings.
While the journey to change may be gradual, these findings suggest that compassion could be a pivotal element in addressing longstanding issues in the treatment of mental health patients.
