Jurors in the trial of celebrity crocodile wrangler Matt Wright have been cautioned against allowing emotional responses or extensive media coverage to influence their decisions. The Northern Territory Supreme Court is currently deliberating on three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice related to a tragic helicopter crash in 2022 that resulted in the death of Wright’s co-star, Chris “Willow” Wilson.
Wright, who has pleaded not guilty, is not facing charges directly related to the crash itself. Instead, prosecutors allege that he attempted to obstruct the investigation to conceal inadequate record-keeping within his helicopter business. In his closing arguments, Crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC emphasized that while Wright is not accused of causing the fatal accident, the subsequent events led to serious legal consequences.
The helicopter crash occurred during a crocodile egg-collecting expedition to the King River in Arnhem Land, leaving Wilson dead and pilot Sebastian Robinson severely injured, with the latter facing permanent paralysis. Mr. Gullaci described the incident as both dangerous and risky, highlighting the adventurous lifestyle of those involved, which has captured public imagination.
Mr. Gullaci poignantly remarked on the human cost of the tragedy, stating that both Wilson and Robinson were “in the prime of their life, with potential unlimited.” He explained, “They set out that morning believing they would camp that night with friends, unaware of the impending tragedy.” The prosecutor urged the jury to remain focused on the facts of the case while setting aside personal feelings or prejudices.
As the trial progresses, Gullaci noted the emotional toll on witnesses, including Wright and his wife, Kaia Wright, who were visibly affected while recounting the events surrounding the crash. He stated, “You’d have to be made of stone not to be affected by how these events have impacted a number of people, in addition to the immediate families.”
The prosecution underscored the relationship between Wilson and Robinson, suggesting that their bond has been irreparably damaged by the incident. “You will have emotional reactions and potentially strong views,” Gullaci acknowledged, urging jurors to act impartially. “You’ve got to park those feelings — emotion, sympathy, and prejudice must be set aside.”
The trial has featured extensive testimony from Robinson, who Gullaci described as a “critical witness.” The prosecutor pointed out that Robinson endured a rigorous cross-examination from defense barrister David Edwardson KC, who sought to undermine his credibility. “They’ve thrown everything at him but the kitchen sink,” Gullaci remarked, noting the high stakes involved in the case.
During testimony, Robinson admitted to making a significant decision that contributed to the crash, which Gullaci characterized as a crucial moment in the trial. “He weathered the cross-examination; he was still upright and on his feet at the end,” the prosecutor stated, highlighting Robinson’s resilience.
In addressing the jury, Gullaci also reminded them to disregard the overwhelming media attention surrounding the case. “No one cares that he’s a celebrity,” he asserted, referring to Wright’s status as a public figure from shows like Outback Wrangler and Wild Croc Territory. He emphasized that the media saturation should not affect the jury’s deliberations.
The trial continues in Darwin, with Mr. Gullaci expected to conclude his closing remarks. Following this, the defense will have the opportunity to present its case. The outcome of this trial holds significant implications not only for Wright but also for the broader discussions about safety and accountability in high-risk professions.
