Academics at the Australian National University (ANU) and representatives from Transparency International Australia have called for greater transparency regarding the advisory relationships that influenced the university’s recent decision-making processes. This push for openness comes amidst concerns over governance issues and potential conflicts of interest, particularly related to the university’s negotiations on significant budget cuts.
Clancy Moore, the chief executive of Transparency International Australia, emphasized the necessity for proactive disclosures, stating, “Given the dark clouds engulfing ANU with reported conflicts of interests and poor governance, proactive disclosures and transparency are a must.” The sentiment reflects growing unease among staff and stakeholders regarding who is shaping critical decisions at the institution during a challenging period.
One focal point of concern among ANU faculty is the university’s communications strategy, which has faced criticism for its effectiveness. Invoices obtained by The Canberra Times shed light on the advisory support provided by public relations firm 89 Degrees East. Notably, one invoice listed services by Mike Kaiser, who billed the university for four days of “communications and stakeholder engagement support,” amounting to $13,000, or $3,250 per day. Another invoice detailed charges of $11,375 for three-and-a-half days of similar services by Kimberley Gardiner, a professional with an extensive background in public affairs.
Gardiner has previously worked with notable political figures, including Australia’s first female deputy prime minister and the first female premier of Queensland. Her involvement in shaping ANU’s communications strategy raises questions about the university’s decision-making processes and the influence of external consultants.
The connection between Kaiser and ANU is further complicated by his current role as the secretary of the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, which he assumed on July 14, 2023. At the time he provided consulting services to ANU, Kaiser was operating as a freelancer, a detail that is crucial in assessing any potential conflicts of interest.
Transparency International has highlighted the importance of understanding the ties between public servants and institutions like ANU, especially to prevent any perception of conflicts of interest. Moore stated, “Transparency is the foundation for trust in government and public institutions.” He noted that the Australian Public Service (APS) Code of Conduct mandates public servants to avoid conflicts of interest and to disclose any private sector work that might raise concerns.
While Kaiser declined a request for an interview from The Canberra Times, his department indicated that he had informed ministers of any relevant conflicts of interest. Both Kaiser and Gardiner share a background in the Australian Labor Party, which may further complicate perceptions regarding their advisory roles.
The ongoing turmoil at ANU, which has included efforts to cut $100 million from its wage bill, underscores the urgency of these calls for transparency. As the university navigates these challenges, clarity regarding the sources of advice and decision-making processes remains essential for the confidence of its staff and stakeholders.
As discussions about governance and accountability continue, the spotlight on ANU’s advisory relationships reflects broader concerns about integrity and transparency within public institutions. The outcome of this scrutiny may have significant implications for the university’s future direction and its standing within the academic community.
