As the Nobel Peace Prize deliberations approach, Donald Trump faces significant hurdles in his quest for recognition. The announcement will take place on December 10, 2025, amid ongoing discussions about the impact of his leadership style and policies on international peace. Insiders suggest that Trump’s divisive approach and military posturing conflict with the ideals established by Alfred Nobel, the prize’s founder.
Trump has publicly claimed to have “solved” six wars and pressured the Norwegian Nobel Committee to acknowledge his contributions, including a recent breakthrough in Gaza which has seen agreements between Israel and Hamas. This deal involves the release of Israeli hostages and the withdrawal of Israeli troops. The committee, however, remains largely insulated from such lobbying efforts, emphasizing their commitment to deliberative independence.
In a recent statement, Kristian Berg Harpviken, the Nobel Committee’s secretary, asserted that “our procedures are set up to insulate the actual deliberations from campaigns, media debate, and other possible influences.” This suggests that despite Trump’s high-profile advocacy for the prize, it is unlikely to sway the committee’s decision.
Trump’s Peace Efforts and Their Reception
Trump’s claim to the Peace Prize is primarily rooted in the 2020 Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations. He also cites his involvement in peace negotiations between countries such as India and Pakistan, and Rwanda and Congo. Critics argue that his role in these matters has been overstated, noting that the stability of some agreements has already begun to falter.
Asle Toje, a current member of the Nobel Committee, cautioned against intense lobbying efforts, noting that such campaigns often backfire. He stated, “We talk about it on the committee. Some candidates push for it really hard and we do not like it.” This sentiment aligns with the committee’s historical tendency to prioritize candidates who genuinely embody the ideals of peace and cooperation.
An insider familiar with the workings of the Nobel Committee highlighted the importance of reflecting on global humanity and dignity when considering nominees for the Peace Prize. They emphasized that Trump’s actions, particularly his cuts to USAID and tariffs on international trade, do not align with the principles that Nobel championed.
Future Prospects and Ongoing Advocacy
Despite the current challenges, there remains a possibility for Trump’s recognition should peace efforts in Gaza yield lasting results. The president’s strategy includes leveraging Qatar to exert pressure on Hamas, potentially paving the way for a more comprehensive peace agreement. An insider noted that if Trump were indeed instrumental in achieving a sustainable peace, it could complicate the committee’s decision-making process.
Historian Asle Sveen expressed skepticism about Trump’s chances, suggesting that winning the prize would require a significant shift in perceptions, perhaps even a “nervous breakdown” among committee members. The deliberations are confidential for 50 years, meaning the specifics of discussions surrounding Trump’s candidacy will remain undisclosed until 2075.
Even if Trump does not secure the prize this time, he may have further opportunities in the future. Claudia Tenney, a U.S. congresswoman who nominated him, has stated her intention to continue advocating for his recognition until he receives the accolade.
The Nobel Peace Prize aims to identify individuals or organizations that have significantly contributed to international fraternity, a goal that remains steadfast even amid the complexities of contemporary geopolitics. As the December announcement approaches, the world will watch closely to see how the committee navigates these challenges and whose contributions they ultimately choose to honor.
