UPDATE: Five former chairs of VicHealth have urgently called on Premier Jacinta Allan, Treasurer Jaclyn Symes, and Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas to reconsider their shocking decision to abolish the state’s leading health promotions agency. The proposal, labeled a “bone-headed decision” by public health experts, threatens to dismantle a crucial entity known for its innovative work in preventative health.
This urgent appeal comes in the wake of a review by former bureaucrat Helen Silver, which recommended folding VicHealth into the Department of Health. Experts warn that this major change could lead to decreased investment in preventative health measures, ultimately resulting in a sicker population and escalating hospital costs.
In a letter addressed to state leaders, former VicHealth chairs including Nicola Roxon and Mark Birrell emphasized that this misguided move would undermine vital public health initiatives aimed at combating chronic diseases. They highlighted that for every dollar spent on preventative health, an impressive $14.30 is saved in future health costs.
“The decision is misguided and will fail to deliver the hoped-for savings,” the former chairs stated. They fear that a busy Health Department focused on acute care would neglect essential prevention efforts.
A government spokesperson defended the proposed changes, claiming they would reduce duplication between VicHealth and the department. “VicHealth was established almost 40 years ago, and significant changes have occurred in the public health landscape since that time,” the spokesperson asserted.
However, opposition figures like Jess Wilson have demanded assurances that this decision will not diminish preventative health initiatives. The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, which operates as VicHealth, has an annual budget of $45 million, a mere 0.13 percent of the state’s projected health spending.
The Silver Review, which tabled its findings last week, only briefly explained the recommendation to dissolve VicHealth, asserting that its work could be integrated into the Department without compromising service quality. Critics argue that this diminishes VicHealth’s independence and effectiveness in tackling public health challenges.
Dr. Tim Read, a board member from the Greens, emphasized the importance of VicHealth’s guaranteed budget and political independence. “Powerful corporations target public health with processed food and tobacco marketing. This is why VicHealth’s independent voice and funding are crucial,” he stated.
Concerns are escalating that VicHealth’s resources may be redirected towards more immediate health crises, such as hospital budgets and elective surgery waitlists, should it lose its independent status. Public Health Association of Australia CEO Terry Slevin voiced fears that the department had already seen its public health capacity severely diminished.
As the government moves forward with plans to consolidate or abolish various public entities identified in the Silver Review, the future of VicHealth remains uncertain. With mounting pressure from public health advocates and former leaders, the urgency for action is palpable.
The situation continues to develop, and all eyes are on the Victorian government as this significant public health issue unfolds. The community is urged to stay informed and advocate for the preservation of VicHealth’s independent role in promoting health and preventing chronic disease.
