A significant divide among European leaders regarding climate change has hindered efforts to establish new carbon emission targets ahead of an important United Nations summit. As the UN Climate Summit approaches, leaders are grappling with concerns over economic implications, leading to a delay in a formal commitment to cut emissions by 2035.
French President Emmanuel Macron faces criticism for the impasse, with leaders from Italy and Poland also expressing reservations about deeper cuts amid ongoing challenges like low economic growth and the war in Ukraine. The lack of consensus means that the European Union (EU) will not announce a formal target for 2035 in time for the meeting in New York next week, and discussions are ongoing regarding a potential agreement before the climate summit in Brazil in November.
Concerns Over Climate Leadership
This setback has prompted environmental groups to issue warnings about the implications for the global aim of limiting temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius as stipulated in the Paris Agreement. EU ministers were unable to finalize a binding commitment, resulting in a non-binding “statement of intent” that outlines a goal of reducing emissions by 66.25 percent to 72.5 percent by 2035.
EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra acknowledged the difficulty of building consensus, stating, “Building consensus is something that takes time.” This statement underscores the broader challenges facing the EU as it attempts to balance environmental commitments with economic realities.
The EU’s target appears to align closely with Australia’s recently announced goal, where Prime Minister Anthony Albanese committed to reducing emissions by 62 percent to 70 percent. However, direct comparisons of these targets are complicated due to differing baselines—1990 for the EU and 2005 for Australia.
Climate scientist Bill Hare, founder of Climate Analytics, criticized the EU’s position, describing the lack of a stronger target as a “major embarrassment.” He emphasized that a target exceeding 77 percent reduction is necessary to align with the Paris Agreement objectives. “The difference between the proposal on the table and what’s needed for 1.5 degrees Celsius is not just a numerical gap; it’s a crucial test of the EU’s political will and its climate credibility,” Hare stated.
Economic Factors and Industry Concerns
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has voiced concerns about the potential economic impact of aggressive emissions cuts, arguing that it could harm industries at a time when European nations are investing heavily in defense and manufacturing. In remarks made earlier this year, she noted, “In a desert, there is nothing green. Before anything else, we must fight the desertification of European industry.”
The discussions surrounding the 2035 targets are part of a larger conversation about an ambitious EU proposal to achieve a 90 percent reduction in emissions by 2040, which aims to pave the way toward net-zero emissions. EU ministers plan to reconvene in October to finalize a formal Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) in time for the upcoming summit in Brazil. Additionally, China is expected to announce its new NDC next week, adding further pressure on European leaders to act decisively.
Macron has emphasized the need for targets to remain “compatible with our competitiveness,” suggesting that EU members should take the necessary time to reach a consensus. Meanwhile, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has raised alarms about the pace of EU climate initiatives, warning that economic instability could overshadow environmental concerns. “If we go bankrupt, no one will care about the world’s environment anymore,” he remarked earlier this year.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has also critiqued EU mandates regarding electric vehicles, opposing plans to phase out the sale of internal combustion engines by 2035. “We need more flexibility in regulation,” he stated during a recent address at a motor show in Munich.
While countries like Spain and Denmark advocate for stronger climate action, their efforts are met with resistance from the Czech Republic and some of the EU’s largest economies. The World Wildlife Fund has highlighted the urgency of addressing climate issues, pointing to the devastating effects of recent heat waves in Europe, which resulted in 16,500 deaths and an economic impact of €43 billion (approximately $77 billion).
Shirley Matheson from the WWF remarked, “With so many countries looking to Europe to decide on their own NDCs, this was a missed opportunity for the EU to raise the bar and inspire others to follow.”
The current climate discourse in Europe underscores a critical moment as leaders must navigate the complexities of environmental responsibility and economic viability. The decisions made in the coming months will not only impact the EU but may also influence global climate action initiatives.
