The beginning of 2026 has been marked by significant geopolitical events, including the apprehension of the Venezuelan president and bold assertions regarding Greenland. These developments have cast a spotlight on Stephen Miller, a key advisor to Donald Trump, whose influence within the administration appears to be growing. In a recent profile for The Atlantic, journalist Ashley Parker delves into Miller’s role as deputy chief of staff and his impact on a range of policies from immigration to foreign affairs.
Miller is known for his intense and uncompromising approach to policy, particularly regarding immigration. According to Parker, his focus on this issue is unwavering, stating that if Miller could dedicate all his time to one subject, it would be immigration. However, his responsibilities have expanded beyond this singular focus. He now plays a critical role in shaping policies affecting foreign relations, education, and trade.
Parker’s investigation highlights the duality of Miller’s influence; while he is seen as a fierce advocate for Trump’s agenda, he is also perceived by some as a manipulative figure, sometimes referred to as the “puppet master.” Despite such labels, Miller maintains that he is simply executing the president’s directives with efficiency and urgency. His hardline stances often push the boundaries of conventional policy discussions within the administration.
In her profile, Parker notes that while Miller did not participate in an interview, insights from numerous individuals who know him—both positively and negatively—provide a comprehensive understanding of his motivations and strategies. Notably, Miller’s views on immigration are often more extreme than Trump’s. This has raised questions about his influence during policy debates. Sources indicate that while Miller passionately argues his case, he ultimately respects the president’s final decisions.
Miller’s involvement in critical decisions extends beyond immigration. He has been a driving force in significant military operations, including the recent developments in Venezuela. His approach to U.S. military actions reflects a belief in demonstrating strength on the global stage, a sentiment echoed in a recent interview where he stated, “The United States is using its military to secure our interests unapologetically.” This perspective has sparked debate, with critics labeling it as a manifestation of imperialism.
The internal dynamics of the Trump administration reveal a complex relationship between Miller and the president. In a notable incident involving a confidential chat among senior officials regarding military actions, it was Miller who ultimately steered the conversation, emphasizing the president’s desires. This incident underscores Miller’s significant influence, even among higher-ranking officials.
In addition to his policy influence, Miller’s personal experiences have shaped his public rhetoric. Following the assassination of activist Charlie Kirk, observers noted a shift in his tone, which some interpret as a reflection of heightened anxiety regarding national security. This concern is compounded by threats directed at his family, prompting them to seek refuge on a military base.
Miller’s wife, Katie Miller, has also been in the spotlight, recently sharing a controversial image of an American flag over a map of Greenland. This has led to speculation about potential U.S. actions regarding the territory, which were previously dismissed as fanciful during Trump’s first term. The current administration’s willingness to entertain such ideas suggests a new era of unpredictability in U.S. foreign policy.
As 2026 unfolds, the implications of Miller’s growing influence raise important questions about the direction of U.S. policy under Trump. Observers are left to consider how far the administration may go in pursuing its objectives, both domestically and internationally. With Miller’s fingerprints on a wide array of issues, the coming months are likely to reveal more about his role in shaping the future of U.S. governance.
